ARCH PRINCE’S TEMPORARY LIFESTYLE ISSUES ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

I am told that I had those many things I said which I could not make action from, but the problem has never changed at all – the same case of finding alternatives to responding to abuses and property destruction in a way that moves off from the direction in which I am being pushed. What has become quite clear over time, is that I will not be seeking their alternatives for an eternity as expected. So what has happened in the last 15 years is the destruction of my University studies, then my career prospects after and now my Bookshop, so the way it is damaged is that each time it makes progress or the Public is interested in it, Celebrities will damage it and find their actions amusing, as per the rewarding aspects of their civil disobedience, as applicable to the business of making money from the idea they had something that was more special and more important than what I am doing i.e. what I mean when I say that I will not be seeking alternative ways to respond to it forever.  What happens with the people who have stirred this up is that they are always playing power grab games at the Monarchy, securing some form of influence for Royal In-laws with it, in this way which we find that they are always making a mess of Public life and then they allowed Celebrities run riot all over it, only to get me stuck with the Criminals that have picked up the Celebrity interests and the way that Celebrities worked with those criminals, to build up publicity for themselves which suggests that when I serve the Queen and the UK Government, I served them as well. The consequence of this, added to damage done my academic pursuits is that they now also have a reputation for complaining about me on a global stage and people laugh at them because they cannot substantiate my person as such to make those complains, even though they had to because they had little choice. I too do not think they were prepared to back up any ways in which I would respond to a threat to these facts and therefore need to avoid threatening me, I am also of the opinion that instead of complaining about me, not handling me was never the more difficult aspect of this matter as such.

So, in terms of the shameful way, they claim I lived – what really happened is that I stripped down my finances for the work I had to do, and it never meant I had to be cash strapped, they decided I had to be. Such that when I prepared to get the finances resolved, we found that they had developed practical jokes alongside their popularity gits and celebrities to get rich fast on it, after the mess made of the finances, every time they then get off to say that I am not worthy of my position, the social part they played was counterproductive and very painful for me. It does not mean that we do not work together either; their own is to ensure those who interfere with Royal Publicity ended up with situations where they dealt with the bottom chasing issues at the most unexpected venues but the disadvantage is that those people then showed up somewhere to make the most of it at popular culture, ripping into the public reputation of the Royals with none to control them – mine is that they trash my academic work and show up somewhere with ideas about being able to make sense of everything I did as at least a 4 level advancement with respect to expertise and thinking processes on everything that I did with career and work, with which they set about abuses of the worst possible kind and a process of beating me down, which actually does not prevent me from doing what I had to do as such, until they pillaged my finances to hang about looking as if they were incredibly good at seeking out trouble. They do suggest I had difficulty making the tough decisions which I don’t believe I do as it generally means that the disadvantage of the way I work is that somebody will show up and ascertain that 100 companies in whose concerns I had a certain amount of influence ought to ditch my influence because I had no money but it could only mean that they wanted to solve a money problem or thought that existing money problems should be solved and if they are not prepared to simply allow others carry on with the day job, we have got a problem.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland